Thanks to All for a Successful 30th Anniversary Event!

CPS Past President Paula Parnagian, current President Ann O'Halloran, Executive Director Marilyn Segal, and Board Members Norma Shapiro and Julie Johnson, from left to right.

CPS’s 30th Anniversary Celebration was vibrant and meaningful.  Over a hundred supporters gathered, sharing hors d’oeuvres and conversation.  Those who were there at the birth of CPS celebrated alongside our newest activists and friends.

The high points of the evening were the awards to those whose efforts marked the beginning, middle and current efforts of CPS to promote, protect and preserve public education.

Rep. Byron Rushing’s 1980s work opposing an amendment to the Massachusetts Constitution that would have allowed public aid to private schools resonates with CPS efforts since 1982 to understand, inform and resist ongoing efforts to privatize all aspects of public education.

The stalwart Gloucester plaintiffs have been resisting the imposition of a charter school for over two years.  They’re on the front lines of a struggle that is affecting communities across Massachusetts and the nation.   → Read More

Join us to celebrate CPS’s 30th Anniversary on June 14th!

In the spring of 1982, a small group of committed activists came together to fight a ballot question that threatened to seriously undermine Massachusetts public schools. The coalition named itself Citizens for Public Schools and went on to wage a successful campaign to prevent public aid to private schools.

This year, like 30 years ago, a misnamed and ill-conceived ballot question–backed by a group claiming to speak for children–would undermine our public school educators and students. CPS has joined with others to fight this ballot question, just as we fought and won in 1982.

To honor and continue this important work, we need a party!  On Thursday, June 14, from 5:30 to 7:30 pm, a celebratory event in honor of our 30th Anniversary will be held at the home of Deborah Goldberg and Michael Winter, 37 Hyslop Road, Brookline.

To sponsor, send a greeting in the program, make a donation or buy a ticket online, click here.    → Read More

Stop Corporate Control of Education: Sign the Pledge

Venture capitalists and deep-pocketed corporate foundations, such as Bain Capital and the Walton Family Foundation, are moving aggressively to remake MA public schools based on their right-wing ideology. They are funding “Stand for Children” to sell a ballot initiative that would undermine our children’s learning environment and sharply restrict teacher job protections. Don’t let them do in Massachusetts what they did to Illinois!

To learn more and sign a pledge calling on Stand for Children to withdraw its ballot initiative, click here. 

   → Read More

News Alert: 64 Former Stand Activists Oppose Ballot Measure

A group of former activists with Stand for Children have endorsed an open letter calling on Stand for Children to withdraw their ballot initiative.

The group, which includes parents and school committee members from across Massachusetts, wrote:

The proposed ballot measure attempts to blow up the collaborative work that created the new regulations last spring. It does nothing to improve teaching in our schools. What it does is put the careers of our teachers at the mercy of an untested rating system, violating the recommendations of the people who designed that system.

We fear the result would be to drive some of our best teachers away from the schools that need them most.

To read the full letter, click here.   → Read More

Stand for Children’s Ballot Question: Bad for Teachers, Kids and Schools

The ballot initiative by the numbers:

Words: 2826
Pages: 5
Sections: 11
Provisions supported by data-driven scientific research: 0

Just the FAQs

The “Stand for Children” campaign is called “Great Teachers, Great Schools.” What does the ballot initiative do to help teachers improve their teaching and become “great teachers”?
Nothing. It’s not about that.

What does the Stand proposal do to make schools great—Cut class size? Improve leadership? Lengthen learning time? Help parents get more involved with their children’s learning?
No. It’s not about any of those things.

So what is the “Stand for Children” proposal about?
Many things. One of them is that new, untested teacher ratings would drive critical staffing decisions including layoffs and transfers. (However, principals could ignore the ratings—see below.) To read more, click here.   → Read More